{"id":11648,"date":"2022-01-28T11:35:41","date_gmt":"2022-01-28T10:35:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/?page_id=11648"},"modified":"2024-10-01T16:37:30","modified_gmt":"2024-10-01T14:37:30","slug":"article-55","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/instruments\/garanties-internationales\/convention-du-cap\/depositaire\/declarations-deposees-en-vertu-de-la-convention-du-cap-relative-aux-garanties-internationales-portant-sur-des-materiels-dequipement-mobiles-2-2\/article-55\/","title":{"rendered":"Article 55"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=&#8221;D\u00e9clarations d\u00e9pos\u00e9es en vertu de la Convention du Cap relative aux garanties internationales portant sur des mat\u00e9riels d\u2019\u00e9quipement mobiles concernant l\u2019article 55&#8243; font_container=&#8221;tag:h2|text_align:center&#8221; use_theme_fonts=&#8221;yes&#8221;][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">La version fran\u00e7aise est en pr\u00e9paration<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Australia<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Government of Australia declares that, in accordance with Article 55, it will not apply any of the provisions of Article 13 or Article 43.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>China<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3. Declaration under Article 43 of the Convention: Article 43 is applicable to the PRC, and paragraph 1 and 2 (a) hereinto are applicable under the condition that the court of a Contracting State chosen by the parties shall be a court located in a place that has actual connections with the dispute of the agreement.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Denmark<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pursuant to Article 55 of the Cape Town Convention, where the debtor is domiciled in the territory of a Member State of the European Union, the Kingdom of Denmark will apply Articles 13 and 43 of the Convention for the interim relief only in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1215\/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters as interpreted by Court of Justice of the European Union in the context of Article 24 of the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With regard to the declaration made by the Kingdom of Denmark pursuant to Article 55 of the Convention regarding the application of Articles 13 and 43 of the Convention, this declaration will not apply to Greenland and therefore only to Denmark. *<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px; text-align: justify;\">*<span style=\"color: #c20e0e;\">[This declaration was notified to UNIDROIT by the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark, as a subsequent declaration pursuant to Article 57(1) of the Convention, on 13 March 2024, and in accordance with Article 57(2) of the Convention it took effect on 1 October 2024.]<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Ethiopia<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">No declaration under Article 55 of the Convention.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Iceland<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Declaration under Article 55<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pursuant to Article 55 of the Convention, it is declared that where the debtor is domiciled in the territory of a European Economic Area, the Member States bound by The Lugano Convention 1988 and 2007 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters, will apply Articles 13 and 43 of the Cape Town Convention for interim relief only in accordance with Article 31 of the 2007 Lugano Convention interpreted in the context of Article 24 of the 1988 Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Namibia<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Declaration under Article 55<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In respect of Article 13(1)(a), (b) or (c) of the Convention, the Republic of Namibia declares that \u201cspeedy relief\u201d shall mean sixty (60) court days.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>New Zealand<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">New Zealand declares, in accordance with Article 55, that it will not apply any of the provisions of Article 13 or Article 43.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Norway<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pursuant to Article 55 of the Cape Town Convention, Norway declares that where the debtor is domiciled in the territory of a European Economic Area, the Member States bound by The Lugano Convention 1998 and 2007 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters, will apply Articles 13 and 43 of the Cape Town Convention for interim relief only in accordance with Article 31 of the 2007 Lugano Convention interpreted in the context of Article 24 of the 1998 Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Union europ\u00e9enne<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I. D\u00e9claration de la Communaut\u00e9 europ\u00e9enne en vertu de l\u2019article 55 de la convention relative aux garanties internationales portant sur des mat\u00e9riels d\u2019\u00e9quipement mobiles (\u201cla convention du Cap\u201d).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">En vertu de l\u2019article 55 de la convention du Cap, lorsque le d\u00e9biteur est domicili\u00e9 sur le territoire d\u2019un \u00c9tat membre de la Communaut\u00e9, les \u00c9tats membres li\u00e9s par le r\u00e8glement (CE) n\u00b0 44\/2001 du Conseil du 22 d\u00e9cembre 2000 concernant la comp\u00e9tence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l\u2019ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions en mati\u00e8re civile et commerciale<sup>1<\/sup>\u00a0n\u2019appliqueront les articles 13 et 43 de la convention du Cap pour l\u2019octroi de mesures provisoires que conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 31 du r\u00e8glement n\u00b0 44\/2001, tel qu\u2019interpr\u00e9t\u00e9 par la Cour de Justice des Communaut\u00e9s europ\u00e9ennes dans le cadre de l\u2019article 24 de la convention de Bruxelles du 27 septembre 1968 concernant la comp\u00e9tence judiciaire et l\u2019ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions en mati\u00e8re civile et commerciale<sup>2<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">_______________<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><sup>1<\/sup>\u00a0OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><sup>2<\/sup>\u00a0OJ L 299, 31.12.1972, p. 1.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=&#8221;D\u00e9clarations d\u00e9pos\u00e9es en vertu de la Convention du Cap relative aux garanties internationales portant sur des mat\u00e9riels d\u2019\u00e9quipement mobiles concernant l\u2019article 55&#8243; font_container=&#8221;tag:h2|text_align:center&#8221; use_theme_fonts=&#8221;yes&#8221;][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] La version fran\u00e7aise est en pr\u00e9paration &nbsp; Australia The Government of Australia declares that, in accordance with Article 55, it&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/instruments\/garanties-internationales\/convention-du-cap\/depositaire\/declarations-deposees-en-vertu-de-la-convention-du-cap-relative-aux-garanties-internationales-portant-sur-des-materiels-dequipement-mobiles-2-2\/article-55\/\">&hellip;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"parent":10195,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-11648","page","type-page","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11648\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}