{"id":6253,"date":"2021-08-16T09:00:54","date_gmt":"2021-08-16T09:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/?page_id=6253"},"modified":"2021-08-16T09:00:59","modified_gmt":"2021-08-16T09:00:59","slug":"bibliographie","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/instruments\/procedure-civile\/ali-unidroit-principles\/bibliographie\/","title":{"rendered":"Bibliographie"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column css=”.vc_custom_1490017614850{margin-bottom: 30px !important;}”][vc_custom_heading text=”BIBLIOGRAPHIE” font_container=”tag:h1|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” css=”.vc_custom_1629104492282{margin-top: 0px !important;margin-bottom: 20px !important;}”][vc_custom_heading text=”TRANSNATIONAL CIVIL PROCEDURE: SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY – PROCEDURE CIVIL TRANSNATIONALE: BIBLIOGRAPHIE
\n” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1622455036974{background-color: #f2f2f2 !important;}”][vc_column css=”.vc_custom_1490017614850{margin-bottom: 30px !important;}”][vc_column_text]AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE \u2013 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR THE UNIFICATION OF PRIVATE LAW, ALI\/UNIDROIT principles and rules of transnational civil procedure: proposed final draft (March 9, 2004), St. Paul, Min., Rome, ALI, UNIDROIT, 2004, pp. XXX-213.<\/p>\n

AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE \u2013 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR THE UNIFICATION OF LAW, Principles of transnational civil procedure: as adopted and promulgated by The American Law Institute at Washington, D.C., U.S.A. May 2004 and by UNIDROIT at Rome, Italy April 2004. – New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. LIX-177. – ISBN: 978-0-521-85501-3.<\/p>\n

ANDREWS, N., Provisional and protective measures: towards a uniform protective order in civil matters, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001) 931-949<\/p>\n

BEAUMONT, B., The proposed ALI\/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure and their relationship to Australian jurisdictions, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 951-970<\/p>\n

BENETI, S.A., Direito processual de integra\u00e7\u00e3o, in: KLEINHEISTERKAMP, J. – LORENZO IDIARTE, G.A. (Eds.) – Avances del Derecho Internacional Privado en Am\u00e9rica Latina. Liber Amicorum J\u00fcrgen Samtleben, Montevideo, Fundaci\u00f3n de Cultura Universitaria, 2002, 489-515<\/p>\n

B\u00c9RAUDO, J.-P., R\u00e9flexions sur les Principes ALI\/UNIDROIT \u00e0 propos de la preuve, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 925-930<\/p>\n

CADIET, L., La preuve, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 119-138.<\/p>\n

COOPER, E.H., Transnational civil procedure: fact pleading or notice pleading? A viewpoint from the USA, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 857-869<\/p>\n

CURRIE, D.P., Universal jurisdiction, in: SCHWENZER, I. \u2013 HAGER, G. (Eds.) \u2013 Festschrift f\u00fcr Peter Schlechtriem zum 70. Geburtstag, T\u00fcbingen, J.B.C. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 2003, 347-351.<\/p>\n

DIALLO, Ousmane, Vers une harmonisation internationale des r\u00e8gles de proc\u00e9dure civile, in : CHAPPUIS, Christine [Ed.] [et al.] – L\u2019harmonisation internationale du droit, 2007, pp. 499-521<\/p>\n

DODSON, Scott \u2013 KLEBBA, James M., Global civil procedure trends in the twenty-first century, in: Boston College international and comparative law journal, 34 (2011), pp. 1-26.<\/p>\n

ELMER, M.B., Brief considerations on the harmonisation of civil procedure in Europe and worldwide, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 8 (2003), 461-463.<\/p>\n

ELSEN, S.H., An American lawyer looks at litigation under the proposed ALI\/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 971-980<\/p>\n

FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.), La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, Paris, Ed. juridiques et techniques, 2004, pp. 351 (Collection droit et proc\u00e9dures).<\/p>\n

FERRAND, F., Les “Principes” relatifs \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure civile transnationale sont-ils autosuffisants? – De la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 ou non de les assortir de “R\u00e8gles” dans le projet, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 995-1013<\/p>\n

FERRAND, F., Der ALI-Unidroit-Entwurf \u00fcber transnationale Prinzipien und Regeln im Zivilverfahrensrecht, in: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Europ\u00e4isches Privatrecht, 2004, 616-630.<\/p>\n

FERRAND, F., La proc\u00e9dure civile internationale et la proc\u00e9dure civile transnationale: l\u2019incidence de l\u2019int\u00e9gration \u00e9conomique r\u00e9gionale, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 8 (2003), 397-436.<\/p>\n

FERRAND, F., La proc\u00e9dure civile internationale et la proc\u00e9dure civile transnationale: l\u2019incidence de l\u2019int\u00e9gration \u00e9conomique regionale, in: Derecho PUC, n. 56, 2003, pp. 361 414.<\/p>\n

FERRAND, F., Rapport entre principes et r\u00e8gles dans le projet, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 27-33.<\/p>\n

FERRAND, F., Les principes ALI \/ UNIDROIT de proc\u00e9dure civile pour les litiges transnationaux en mati\u00e8re commerciale = The ALI \/ UNIDROIT Civil Procedure Principles for Transnational Disputes in Commercial Matters, in: Revue de droit des affaires internationales = International Business Law Journal, 2006, pp. 21-36.<\/p>\n

FORNER I DELAYGUA, J.-J., El proyecto del American Law Institute transnational rules of civil procedure: la cooperaci\u00f3n judicial, in: Anuario espa\u00f1ol de derecho internacional privado, 2000, pp. 275-284.<\/p>\n

FOUCHARD, P. (Ed.), Vers un proc\u00e8s civil universel? Les r\u00e8gles transnationales de proc\u00e9dure civile de l’American Law Institute [Colloque organis\u00e9 par l’Ecole doctorale de droit international, droit europ\u00e9en, relations internationales et droit compar\u00e9 de l’Universit\u00e9 Panth\u00e9on-Assas (Paris II le 27 octobre 2000]. Paris, Editions Panth\u00e9on-Assas, 2001, pp. 313.<\/p>\n

FOUCHARD, P., Une proc\u00e9dure civile transnationale: quelle fin et quels moyens? in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 779-788<\/p>\n

GAUDEMET-TALLON, H., Les aspects de droit international priv\u00e9, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 71-83.<\/p>\n

GEIMER, R., Internationales Zivilprozessrecht und Verfassung sowie International Fundamental Procedural Rights, in: Grenzen \u00fcberwinden \u2013 Prinzipien bewahren, in: 2011, pp. 589 600.<\/p>\n

GIDI, A., Iniciativas para la formulaci\u00f3n de normas uniformes en el \u00e1mbito del Derecho procesal civil internacional, in: Derecho-PUC [Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica del Per\u00fa], (Diciembre 2001), N. 54, 245-252<\/p>\n

GIDI, A., Notes on criticizing the proposed ALI\/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 819-826<\/p>\n

GIDI, A., A presenta\u00e7\u00e3o das normas trasnacionais de processo civil, in: Roma e America. Diritto Romano Comune. Rivista di Diritto dell’Integrazione e Unificazione del Diritto in Europa e in America Latina, 9 (2000), 335-345<\/p>\n

GIDI, A., A presenta\u00e7\u00e3o ao Projeto \u00e0s Normas Transnacionais de Processo Civil [in Portuguese and in Spanish], in: Derecho-PUC [Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica del Per\u00fa], (Diciembre 1998-Abril 1999), N. 52, 593-620<\/p>\n

GLENN, H. P.,The ALI\/UNIDROIT Principles of transnational civil procedure as global standards for adjudication?, in: DeCITA, 4 (2005), pp. 26-44.<\/p>\n

GLENN, H.P., Prospects for transnational civil procedure in the Americas, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 8 (2003), 485-491.<\/p>\n

GOLDSTEIN, S., The Proposed ALI\/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure: the utility of such a harmonization project [in English and French], in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 789-801<\/p>\n

GUINCHARD, S., La proc\u00e9dure mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e: le projet de l\u2019American Law Institute et d\u2019UNIDROIT de principes et r\u00e8gles transnationaux de proc\u00e9dure civile, in: Recueil Dalloz. Cahier rouge, 179 (2003), 2183-2189.<\/p>\n

GUINCHARD, S., Rapport de synth\u00e8se, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 155-168.<\/p>\n

GUNDLACH, E., Europ\u00e4ische Prozessrechtsangleichung: Gegenstand-Struktur-Methode dar-gestellt am Beispiel des Mahnverfahrens, T\u00fcbingen, Mohr, 2005, pp. 280.<\/p>\n

HAZARD Jr, G.C., Fundamentals of civil procedure, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 753-762<\/p>\n

HAZARD Jr., G.C., Transnational rules of civil procedure: a challenge to judges and lawyers, in: Studi Urbinati di Scienze Giuridiche, Politiche ed Economiche, 68 (1999\/2000), 247-266<\/p>\n

HAZARD, G., Objectif du projet, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 23-25.<\/p>\n

HAZARD, G.C. Jr. – TARUFFO, M., Discussion Draft No. 01 Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure, in: Derecho-PUC [Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica del Per\u00fa], (Diciembre 1998-Abril 1999), N. 52, 621-661; Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure Discussion Draft (1999), 661-678; Proyecto de normas transnacionales del proceso civil, 679-703<\/p>\n

HAZARD, G.C. Jr., Civil litigation without frontiers: harmonization and unification of procedural law [in English and in Spanish], in: Derecho-PUC [Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica del Per\u00fa], (Diciembre 1998-Abril 1999), N. 52, 575-591<\/p>\n

HAZARD, G.C., Jr. – TARUFFO, M. – ST\u00dcRNER, R. – GIDI, A., Normas del proceso civil transnacional, in: Derecho-PUC [Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica del Per\u00fa], (Diciembre 2001), N. 54, 263-287<\/p>\n

HAZARD, G.C., International civil procedure and transnational civil procedure: the impact of regional economic integration \u2013 an overview, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 8 (2003), 437-441.<\/p>\n

HUBER, S.,ALI\/UNIDROIT, Entwurf zur Ausarbeitung von Prinzipien und Regeln f\u00fcr transnationale Zivilverfahren. Vorstellung f\u00fcr den deutschsprachigen Raum, in: Praxis des Internationalen Privat \u2013 und Verfahrensrechts, 23 (2003), 555-557.<\/p>\n

JUNILLON, J., L\u2019ensemble du projet, vue critique d\u2019un praticien, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 35-45.<\/p>\n

KEMELMAJER DE CARLUCCI, A., La charge de la preuve dans les Principes et R\u00e8gles ALI\/UNIDROIT relatifs \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure civile internationale, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 915-924<\/p>\n

KEMELMAJER DE CARLUCCI, A., Lineamientos generales de los principios y reglas comunes para los procesos transnacionales (ALI\/UNIDROIT), in: DeCITA, 4 (2005), pp. 45-60.<\/p>\n

KERAMEUS, K.D., Der Zivilprozess und die internationale Rechtsentwicklung, in: \u00d6sterreichische Juristenzeitung, 2004, 661-667.<\/p>\n

KERAMEUS, K.D., Some reflections on procedural harmonisation: reasons and scope, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 8 (2003), 443-451.<\/p>\n

KERAMEUS, K.D., L\u2019harmonisation proc\u00e9durale dans le monde contemporai, in: DeCITA, 4 (2005), pp. 14-25<\/p>\n

KRONKE, H., Der Beweis im Unidroit\/ALI-Projekt “Transnational Principles of Civil Procedure”, in: B\u00d6CKSTIEGEL, K.-H. (Ed.) Der Beweis im internationalen Schiedsverfahren, K\u00f6ln, 2000, 77-84<\/p>\n

KRONKE, H. ,Efficiency, fairness, macro-economic functions: challenges for the harmonisation of transnational civil procedure [in English and in French], in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 740-751<\/p>\n

KRONKE, H., Taking of evidence under the Unidroit\/American Law Institute Project “Transnational Principles of Civil Procedure”, in: Stockholm Arbitration Report, 2000:1, 63-72<\/p>\n

KRONKE, H., Pr\u00e9sentation du projet ALI-UNIDROIT, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 17-22.<\/p>\n

LIMA MARQUEZ, C.,Proc\u00e9dure civile internationale et MERCOSUR: pour dialogue des r\u00e8gles universelles et r\u00e9gionales, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 8 (2003), 465-484.<\/p>\n

MECARELLI, G., Sanction, frais et d\u00e9pens. Les aspects financiers de la proc\u00e9dure, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 139-148.<\/p>\n

MESTRE, Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique , La armonizaci\u00f3n del proceso civil internacional: los principios y reglas elaborados por ALI-UNIDROIT \/ Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Mestre, in: DeCITA, 3 (2005), pp. 407-413.<\/p>\n

MIKEL\u00c9NAS, V., The proposed ALI\/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure and the new Code of Civil Procedure in Lithuania, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 981-993<\/p>\n

NORMAND, J., Le r\u00f4le respectif des parties et du juge dans les Principes de proc\u00e9dure civile transnationale, in: FERRAND, F. (\u00c9d.) \u2013 La proc\u00e9dure civile mondiale mod\u00e9lis\u00e9e, 2004, 103-114.<\/p>\n

OLANO, O., Der Sitz der Gesellschaft im internationalen Zivilverfahrensrecht des MERCOSUR \u2013 de lege lata et de lege ferenda, in: BERTI, S.V. \u2013 GIRSBERGER, D. (Eds.) \u2013 \u201cnur, aber immerhin\u201d. Beitr\u00e4ge zum nationalen und internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht. Festgabe f\u00fcr Anton K. Schnyder zum 50. Geburtstag, Z\u00fcrich, Schulthess, 2002, 151-166.<\/p>\n

PFIEFFER, T., The ALI\/UNIDROIT project: Are Principles sufficient, without the Rules?, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 1015-1033<\/p>\n

POUR-OSTAD, M., Principles of transnational civil procedure \/ Translated by Majid Pour-Ostad. \u2013 Teheran: S.D.I.L., 2008, pag. var. \u2013 ISBN 978-964-8200-24-9<\/p>\n

PRIESTLEY, L.J., Transnational civil procedure – fact pleading v. notice pleading: its significance in the development of evidence, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 841-855<\/p>\n

PROKHORENKO, V.V., Some aspects of unification of civil procedure law, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 8 (2003), 493-498.<\/p>\n

SCHACK, H., Transnational service of process: a call for uniform and mandatory rules, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 827-839<\/p>\n

SILBERMANN, L., A proposed lis pendens rule for courts in the United States. The International judgments project of the American Law Institute, in: EINHORN, T. \u2013 SIEHR, K. (Eds.) \u2013 International cooperation through private international law. Essays in memory of Peter E. Nygh, The Hague, T.C.M. Asser Press, 2004, 341-356.<\/p>\n

STORME, M., Procedural law and the reform of justice: from regional to universal harmonisation, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 763-777<\/p>\n

STRENGER, I., Extraterritorialidade do direito processual, in: KLEINHEISTERKAMP, J. – LORENZO IDIARTE, G.A. (Eds.) – Avances del Derecho Internacional Privado en Am\u00e9rica Latina. Liber Amicorum J\u00fcrgen Samtleben, Montevideo, Fundaci\u00f3n de Cultura Universitaria, 2002, 471-488<\/p>\n

ST\u00dcRNER, R., Transnational civil procedure: discovery and sanctions against non-compliance, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 871-886<\/p>\n

ST\u00dcRNER, R., Proc\u00e9dure civile et culture juridique, in: Revue internationale de droit compar\u00e9, 56 (2004), pp. 797 824.<\/p>\n

ST\u00dcRNER, R., R\u00e8gles transnationales de proc\u00e9dure civile? Quelques remarques d’un Europ\u00e9en sur un nouveau projet commun de l’American Law Institute et d’Unidroit, in: Revue internationale de droit compar\u00e9, 52 (2000), 845-865<\/p>\n

ST\u00dcRNER, R., Some remarks on a new joint project of the Amercan Law Institute and UNIDROIT, in : The International Lawyer, 3 (2000), 1071-1086<\/p>\n

ST\u00dcRNER, R., The Principles of transnational civil procedure, an introduction to their basic conceptions, in: Rabels Zeitschrift f\u00fcr ausl\u00e4ndisches und internationales Privatrecht, 69 (2005), pp. 201-254.<\/p>\n

TARUFFO, M., A project of rules for transnational litigation, in: The Unification of International Commercial Law, 189-199. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1998<\/p>\n

WALDER-RICHLI, H.U., Die Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure im Lichte des schweizerischen Zivilprozessrechts, in: HONSELL, H. [et al.] (Eds.) \u2013 Privatrecht und Methode. Festschrift f\u00fcr Ernst A. Kramer, Basel, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 2004, 1051-1063.<\/p>\n

WALKER, J., The utility of the ALI\/UNIDROIT Project on Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, in: Uniform Law Review \/ Revue de droit uniforme, 6 (2001), 803-818<\/p>\n

WATERSTRAAT, D., ALI – UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure: ein Instrument zur L\u00f6sung des deutsch-amerikanischen Justizkonflikts bei grenz\u00fcber\u00acschreitenden Beweisaufnahmen? \/ Daniel Waterstraat. – 1. Aufl.. – Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006, pp. 211. – ISBN: 3-8329-1715-2 – (Schriften des Augsburg Center for Global Economic Law and Regulation; 4).<\/p>\n

WEBER, J., Universal jurisdiction and third States in the reform of Brussel I regulation, in: Rabels Zeitschrift f\u00fcr ausl\u00e4ndisches und internationales Privatrecht, 75 (2011) 3, pp. 619-644.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”10px”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column css=”.vc_custom_1490017614850{margin-bottom: 30px !important;}”][vc_custom_heading text=”BIBLIOGRAPHIE” font_container=”tag:h1|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” css=”.vc_custom_1629104492282{margin-top: 0px !important;margin-bottom: 20px !important;}”][vc_custom_heading text=”TRANSNATIONAL CIVIL PROCEDURE: SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY – PROCEDURE CIVIL TRANSNATIONALE: BIBLIOGRAPHIE ” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1622455036974{background-color: #f2f2f2 !important;}”][vc_column css=”.vc_custom_1490017614850{margin-bottom: 30px !important;}”][vc_column_text]AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE \u2013 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR THE UNIFICATION OF PRIVATE LAW, ALI\/UNIDROIT principles and …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"parent":6229,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-6253","page","type-page","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6253\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unidroit.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}